Controversial New Underride Guards Mandate: Navigating Safety and Feasibility

Controversial New Underride Guards Mandate: Navigating Safety and Feasibility

Safety vs. Feasibility: The Debate Over Underride Guards

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) plan to mandate side underride guards for trucks has spurred heated debates, as reflected in almost 2,000 comments on a federal regulatory docket. While these guards are designed to prevent passenger vehicles from sliding under trailers during accidents, some argue they may bring more harm than benefits. Among the dissenters is Lewie Pugh from the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA), who pointed out potential unintended safety issues and a spike in costs.

Cost Concerns Raised by Industry Stakeholders

According to recent NHTSA research, the potential extra costs of mandating these guards could exceed $3,740 per trailer just for the equipment and installation. The NHTSA also estimates that side underride guards could have the potential to increase lifetime fuel costs for new trailers entering the fleet each year by $200 million to $450 million due to an increase in weight. OOIDA argues these estimates fail to account for various factors that would drive up the total costs.

One of the Most Expensive Federal Trucking Mandates?

OOIDA warned that mandatory side guards would necessitate strengthening the beams, frame rails, and floor of the trailer, further escalating costs. Estimates have already begun to roll in placing the overall expense of the mandate at over $1 billion. This would make it potentially one of the most expensive federal trucking mandates in history. Beyond this, the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) investigation for a report on this specific issue concluded that alternative approaches might be more cost-effective.

The Trade-Off: Lives Saved vs. Skyrocketing Costs

Even though side underride guards could mitigate fatalities and serious injuries in crashes, the high cost of implementation raises questions about the cost-benefit ratio. NHTSA’s crash statistics revealed that the program’s costs, estimated between $900 million and $1.2 billion, don’t align with the benefits of saving an estimated 17 lives and preventing 69 serious injuries each year. NHTSA estimated that the trucking industry would pay at least $73 million per life saved by this mandate.

Operational Challenges in the Real World

Operational feasibility is another issue voiced by OOIDA and many truckers. Concerns include the hindrance of equipment inspection under the trailer and challenges in navigating railroad crossings, high curbs, and sloped loading docks due to the side underride guards. The NHTSA’s report doesn’t mention these feasibility concerns or the implications of low clearances.

Concerns Over Increasing Operational Costs Amid Inflation

Cost issues are amplified by the current inflationary climate. The added expense of installing underride guards is seen as cost-prohibitive, increasing already high operational costs without commensurate revenue increases. As owner-operator Matt Jackson argued, the additional cost and weight of the guards may not bring substantial safety benefits. He encouraged regulators to focus on driver education instead of imposing more costs on trucking companies and independent owner-operators already dealing with over-regulation and rising expenses.

It’s clear that these potential changes impact the trucking industry significantly, affecting safety, operation, and most importantly, financial considerations. The balance between lives saved and skyrocketing costs is indeed delicate. That being said, how do you view the trade-offs associated with this safety mandate? What are your thoughts on its operational feasibility, and the cost implications amidst our current inflationary climate? Feel free to share your insights and experiences in the comments section below.

Before You Hit the Road…

If you made it to this part of the article, we’d just like to take a moment to thank you for taking the time to read this weekly recap. Be safe out there and as always, If you’re in search of CDL A, B, or warehouse positions, check out our open positions. And if you need staffing solutions for commercial driving or industrial positions, be sure to explore our offerings.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

clients

Jobs

Privacy & Cookies

We use cookies on our website. By continuing to use this site you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our
Privacy and Cookies Policy.

You may opt out at anytime.